banner



Home  ›  What Animal Has The Same Size Brain As A Human

What Animal Has The Same Size Brain As A Human

Written By Thursday, June 9, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Topic of study

The size of the brain is a frequent topic of study inside the fields of beefcake, biological anthropology, animal scientific discipline and evolution. Encephalon size is sometimes measured by weight and sometimes by volume (via MRI scans or by skull volume). Neuroimaging intelligence testing tin be used to written report the volumetric measurements of the brain. Regarding "intelligence testing", a question that has been often investigated is the relation of encephalon size to intelligence. This question is quite controversial and will be addressed further in the department on intelligence. The measure of brain size and cranial capacity is not just important to humans, but to all mammals.

Humans [edit]

In humans, the right cerebral hemisphere is typically larger than the left, whereas the cerebellar hemispheres are typically closer in size. The adult human brain weighs on boilerplate about 1.5 kg (3.3 lb).[1] In men the average weight is about 1370 g and in women about 1200 g.[2] The volume is around 1260  cmiii in men and 1130  cm3 in women, although there is substantial individual variation.[3] Nonetheless another study argued that adult man brain weight is 1,300-1,400g for developed humans and 350-400g for newborn humans. At that place is a range of volume and weights, and not simply one number that i tin definitively rely on, as with torso mass. It is also important to notation that variation betwixt individuals is not as important as variation inside species, as overall the differences are much smaller. The mechanisms of interspecific and intraspecific variation also differ.

Variation and evolution [edit]

From early on primates to hominids and finally to Homo sapiens, the encephalon is progressively larger, with exception of extinct Neanderthals whose brain size exceeded modern Human sapiens. The volume of the man encephalon has increased as humans accept evolved (see Homininae), starting from about 600 cm3 in Homo habilis up to 1680 cmiii in Man neanderthalensis, which was the hominid with the biggest brain size.[4] The increase in brain size stopped with neanderthals. Since then, the boilerplate brain size has been shrinking over the past 28,000 years.[5] One study suggests that this decrease in encephalon size "was surprisingly recent, occurring in the concluding 3,000 years", not the past 28,000 years.[6] The cranial capacity has decreased from around 1,550 cmiii to around 1,440 cmiii in males while the female cranial chapters has shrunk from around 1,500 cm3 to around 1,240 cmthree.[vii] Other sources with bigger sample sizes of modern Man sapiens find approximately the same cranial capacity for males but a higher cranial chapters of around 1330 cm3 in females.[eight]

Trends in hominin brain size evolution[6]

Brain sizes of hominids
Proper noun Brain size (cm3)[9]
Homo habilis 550–687
Homo ergaster 700–900
Homo erectus 600–1250
Man heidelbergensis 1100–1400
Human neanderthalensis 1200–1750
Man sapiens 1400
Human being floresiensis 417 [10]

H. floresiensis' small brain [edit]

Homo floresiensis is a hominin from the island of Flores in Indonesia with fossils dating from 60,000-100,000 years agone.[11] Despite its relatively derived position in the hominin phylogeny, CT imaging of its skull reveals that that its brain book was merely 417 cmiii,[x] less than that of fifty-fifty Homo habilis, which is believed to have gone extinct far before (around one.65 one thousand thousand years ago.[12]). The reason for this regression in brain size is believed to be island syndrome [13] in which the brains of insular species become smaller due to reduced predation hazard. This is beneficial as it reduces the basal metabolic rate without significant increases in predation take a chance.[xiv]

Genetic causes of contempo decrease [edit]

In recent years, experiments take been conducted drawing conclusions to brain size in clan to the gene mutation that causes microcephaly, a neural developmental disorder that affects cerebral cortical volume.[xv]

Sociocultural causes of recent decrease [edit]

A 2021 report proposed that the recent decrease in encephalon size in the final 3,000 years has resulted from externalization of knowledge and group controlling, partly via the advent of social systems of distributed noesis, social organization, segmentation of labor and sharing of information.[16] [half dozen]

Hydrocephalus [edit]

Exceptional cases of hydrocephalus, such as what was reported past John Lorber in 1980 and by a report with rats,[17] [18] advise that relatively high levels of intelligence and relatively normal performance are possible fifty-fifty with very small brains.[19] [20] It is unclear what conclusions could be drawn from such reports – such as about brain capacities, redundancies, mechanics and size requirements.

Biogeographic variation [edit]

Efforts to detect racial or indigenous variation in brain size are generally considered to be a pseudoscientific attempt[21] [22] [23] and have traditionally been tied to scientific racism and attempts to demonstrate a racial intellectual hierarchy.[23] [24] [25] [26]

The majority of efforts to demonstrate this have relied on indirect information that assessed skull measurements as opposed to direct brain observations. These are considered scientifically discredited.[24] [27]

A large-scale 1984 survey of global variation in skulls has concluded that variation in skull and head sizes is unrelated to race, but rather climatic heat preservation, stating "We detect footling support for the use of brain size in taxonomic assessment (other than with paleontological extremes over time). Racial taxonomies which include cranial capacity, caput shape, or any other trait influenced past climate confound ecotypic and phyletic causes. For Pleistocene hominids, nosotros doubt that the volume of the braincase is any more taxonomically 'valuable' than whatever other trait."[28]

Sex [edit]

Average encephalon weight for males and females over lifespan. From the study Changes in brain weights during the span of human life.

A man baby'south brain at birth averages 369 cm3 and increases, during the get-go twelvemonth of life, to nearly 961 cm3, later which the growth rate declines. Brain book peaks at the teenage years,[29] and afterward the age of 40 information technology begins failing at 5% per decade, speeding up around 70.[thirty] Average developed male brain weight is 1,345 grams (47.4 oz), while an developed female has an average encephalon weight of one,222 grams (43.i oz).[31] (This does not take into account neuron density nor brain-to-body mass ratio; men on average besides have larger bodies than women.) Males have been found to take on average greater cerebral, cerebellar and cerebral cortical lobar volumes, except possibly left parietal.[32] The gender differences in size vary by more than specific brain regions. Studies have tended to bespeak that men have a relatively larger amygdala and hypothalamus, while women have a relatively larger caudate and hippocampi. When covaried for intracranial book, tiptop, and weight, Kelly (2007) indicates women accept a college percentage of grey matter, whereas men accept a higher percentage of white matter and cerebrospinal fluid. At that place is high variability betwixt individuals in these studies, still.[iii]

However, Yaki (2011) institute no statistically significant gender differences in the gray matter ratio for most ages (grouped by decade), except in the 3rd and 6th decades of life in the sample of 758 women and 702 men aged 20–69.[33] The average male in their third decade (ages 20–29) had a significantly higher gray matter ratio than the average female person of the same age group. In contrast, among subjects in their sixth decade, the average woman had a significantly larger gray matter ratio, though no meaningful difference was establish among those in their 7th decade of life.

Total cerebral and greyness matter volumes peak during the ages from ten–twenty years (earlier in girls than boys), whereas white affair and ventricular volumes increase. There is a full general pattern in neural development of childhood peaks followed by adolescent declines (e.g. synaptic pruning). Consistent with adult findings, average cognitive volume is approximately 10% larger in boys than girls. Still, such differences should non be interpreted every bit imparting any sort of functional reward or disadvantage; gross structural measures may non reverberate functionally relevant factors such as neuronal connectivity and receptor density, and of note is the high variability of brain size even in narrowly defined groups, for example children at the same age may have every bit much as a 50% differences in total brain volume.[34] Immature girls have on boilerplate relative larger hippocampal volume, whereas the amygdalae are larger in boys.[3] However, multiple studies[35] [36] have found a higher synaptic density in males: a 2008 study reported that men had a significantly higher average synaptic density of 12.9 × 108 per cubic millimeter, whereas in women it was 8.6 × 108 per cubic millimeter, a 33% departure. Other studies have found an average of four billion more neurons in the male person brain,[37] corroborating this divergence, equally each neuron has on boilerplate vii,000 synaptic connections to other neurons.

Pregnant dynamic changes in brain structure take place through adulthood and aging, with substantial variation between individuals. In later decades, men show greater volume loss in whole brain volume and in the frontal lobes, and temporal lobes, whereas in women there is increased book loss in the hippocampi and parietal lobes.[3] Men show a steeper decline in global gray matter book, although in both sexes it varies by region with some areas exhibiting little or no age outcome. Overall white thing volume does non appear to decline with age, although there is variation between encephalon regions.[38]

Genetic contribution [edit]

Adult twin studies have indicated high heritability estimates for overall brain size in machismo (between 66% and 97%). The result varies regionally within the brain, however, with high heritabilities of frontal lobe volumes (90-95%), moderate estimates in the hippocampi (xl-69%), and environmental factors influencing several medial encephalon areas. In addition, lateral ventricle volume appears to be mainly explained by environmental factors, suggesting such factors also play a role in the surrounding encephalon tissue. Genes may cause the association between brain construction and cognitive functions, or the latter may influence the former during life. A number of candidate genes take been identified or suggested, but they await replication.[39] [40]

Intelligence [edit]

Studies demonstrate a correlation betwixt encephalon size and intelligence, larger brains predicting higher intelligence. It is however not clear if the correlation is causal.[41] The majority of MRI studies written report moderate correlations around 0.3 to 0.iv betwixt brain volume and intelligence.[42] [43] The most consistent associations are observed inside the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes, the hippocampus, and the cerebellum, just only account for a relatively small corporeality of variance in IQ, which suggests that while brain size may exist related to human being intelligence, other factors besides play a role.[43] [44] In addition, brain volumes do not correlate strongly with other and more specific cerebral measures.[45] In men, IQ correlates more with gray thing book in the frontal lobe and parietal lobe, which is roughly involved in sensory integration and attending, whereas in women it correlates with gray matter book in the frontal lobe and Broca'due south expanse, which is involved in linguistic communication.[three]

Inquiry measuring brain volume, P300 auditory evoked potentials, and intelligence shows a dissociation, such that both brain volume and speed of P300 correlate with measured aspects of intelligence, only not with each other.[46] [47] Prove conflicts on the question of whether brain size variation as well predicts intelligence between siblings, as some studies find moderate correlations and others find none.[41] A recent review past Nesbitt, Flynn et al. (2012) point out that crude encephalon size is unlikely to be a good mensurate of IQ, for example brain size besides differs betwixt men and women, but without well documented differences in IQ.[41]

A discovery in recent years is that the structure of the adult human encephalon changes when a new cerebral or motor skill, including vocabulary, is learned.[48] Structural neuroplasticity (increased gray matter book) has been demonstrated in adults after three months of preparation in a visual-motor skill, as the qualitative change (i.e. learning of a new task) announced more than critical for the encephalon to modify its structure than continued training of an already-learned task. Such changes (eastward.chiliad. revising for medical exams) have been shown to last for at least 3 months without further practicing; other examples include learning novel speech sounds, musical power, navigation skills and learning to read mirror-reflected words.[49] [fifty]

Other animals [edit]

The largest brains are those of sperm whales, weighing about 8 kg (xviii lb). An elephant's brain weighs but over five kg (11 lb), a bottlenose dolphin'southward i.v to 1.seven kg (3.iii to iii.7 lb), whereas a human being brain is effectually ane.iii to 1.5 kg (2.9 to 3.three lb). Brain size tends to vary according to body size. The human relationship is not proportional, though: the brain-to-body mass ratio varies. The largest ratio found is in the shrew.[51] Averaging brain weight beyond all orders of mammals, it follows a power constabulary, with an exponent of about 0.75.[52] There are practiced reasons to expect a ability police force: for instance, the body-size to body-length relationship follows a power police with an exponent of 0.33, and the torso-size to surface-area relationship follows a ability law with an exponent of 0.67. The explanation for an exponent of 0.75 is not obvious; still, it is worth noting that several physiological variables appear to be related to body size past approximately the same exponent—for example, the basal metabolic rate.[53]

This ability law formula applies to the "average" encephalon of mammals taken as a whole, but each family (cats, rodents, primates, etc.) departs from it to some caste, in a manner that generally reflects the overall "composure" of behavior.[54] Primates, for a given body size, accept brains five to 10 times as big as the formula predicts. Predators tend to accept relatively larger brains than the animals they casualty on; placental mammals (the great majority) have relatively larger brains than marsupials such as the opossum. A standard measure out for assessing an animate being's brain size compared to what would be expected from its body size is known equally the encephalization caliber. The encephalization caliber for humans is between seven.iv-7.eight.[55]

When the mammalian brain increases in size, not all parts increase at the same rate.[56] In item, the larger the brain of a species, the greater the fraction taken upward by the cortex. Thus, in the species with the largest brains, near of their volume is filled with cortex: this applies not only to humans, merely also to animals such as dolphins, whales or elephants. The evolution of Human being sapiens over the past two one thousand thousand years has been marked by a steady increment in brain size, but much of it can exist accounted for by corresponding increases in torso size.[57] There are, withal, many departures from the trend that are hard to explain in a systematic way: in particular, the appearance of modern man most 100,000 years agone was marked by a subtract in torso size at the same time as an increase in encephalon size. Fifty-fifty so, it is noteworthy that Neanderthals, which became extinct about 40,000 years ago, had larger brains than mod Homo sapiens.[58]

Non all investigators are happy with the amount of attending that has been paid to brain size. Roth and Dicke, for example, accept argued that factors other than size are more highly correlated with intelligence, such as the number of cortical neurons and the speed of their connections.[59] Moreover, they point out that intelligence depends not only on the amount of brain tissue, but on the details of how it is structured. It is also well known that crows, ravens, and grey parrots are quite intelligent even though they have small brains.

While humans have the largest encephalization quotient of extant animals, it is not out of line for a primate.[lx] [61] Some other anatomical trends are correlated in the homo evolutionary path with brain size: the basicranium becomes more flexed with increasing brain size relative to basicranial length.[62]

Cranial chapters [edit]

Cranial capacity is a mensurate of the volume of the interior of the skull of those vertebrates who accept a brain. The most commonly used unit of measure is the cubic centimetre (cm3). The volume of the attic is used equally a rough indicator of the size of the brain, and this in turn is used as a rough indicator of the potential intelligence of the organism. Cranial chapters is ofttimes tested past filling the cranial cavity with glass beads and measuring their volume, or by CT scan imaging.[63] [64] A more authentic style of measuring cranial capacity, is to make an endocranial bandage and mensurate the amount of h2o the bandage displaces. In the past there have been dozens of studies washed to estimate cranial capacity on skulls. Most of these studies have been done on dry skull using linear dimensions, packing methods or occasionally radiological methods.[ commendation needed ]

Noesis of the volume of the cranial cavity can exist important information for the report of dissimilar populations with various differences similar geographical, racial, or indigenous origin. Other things can besides affect cranial capacity such as nutrition.[65] It is also used to report correlating between cranial capacity with other cranial measurements and in comparison skulls from different beings. It is usually used to study abnormalities of cranial size and shape or aspects of growth and development of the volume of the brain.[ citation needed ] Cranial capacity is an indirect arroyo to test the size of the brain. A few studies on cranial chapters have been done on living beings through linear dimensions.[ citation needed ]

However, larger cranial capacity is not e'er indicative of a more than intelligent organism, since larger capacities are required for controlling a larger body, or in many cases are an adaptive characteristic for life in a colder environment. For instance, amid modern Man sapiens, northern populations take a 20% larger visual cortex than those in the southern breadth populations, and this potentially explains the population differences in human encephalon size (and roughly cranial capacity).[66] [67] Neurological functions are determined more by the organization of the brain rather than the book. Private variability is also important when considering cranial chapters, for example the average Neanderthal cranial capacity for females was 1300 cm3 and 1600 cm3 for males.[68] Neanderthals had larger eyes and bodies relative to their superlative, thus a disproportionately big area of their brain was dedicated to somatic and visual processing, functions not commonly associated with intelligence. When these areas were adjusted to lucifer anatomically modern human proportions it was establish Neanderthals had brains 15-22% smaller than in anatomically-modern humans.[69] When the neanderthal version of the NOVA1 gene is inserted into stem cells information technology creates neurons with less synapses than stalk cells containing the human version.[lxx]

Parts of a cranium found in China in the 1970s show that the young man had a cranial capacity of effectually 1700cm3 at least 160,000 years agone. This is greater than the average of modern humans.[71] [72]

In an attempt to employ cranial capacity as an objective indicator of brain size, the encephalization quotient (EQ) was developed in 1973 by Harry Jerison. Information technology compares the size of the brain of the specimen to the expected encephalon size of animals with roughly the aforementioned weight.[73] This way a more objective judgement can be made on the cranial capacity of an individual animal. A large scientific collection of brain endocasts and measurements of cranial capacity has been compiled by Holloway.[74]

Examples of cranial capacity

Apes

  • Orangutans: 275–500 cm3 (16.8–30.v cu in)
  • Chimpanzees: 275–500 cm3 (16.8–30.5 cu in)
  • Gorillas: 340–752 cm3 (20.7–45.nine cu in)

Hominids

  • Anatomically-modern human: boilerplate 1473cmiii [69]
  • Neanderthals: 1500-|1740cmthree
  • Xujiayao 6 (160 to 200 ka ago): ca. 1700cm3 [71] [72]
  • Human being erectus; 850 – 1100 cmthree
  • Australopithecus anamensis; 365–370 cm3 [75]
  • Australopithecus afarensis; 438 cm3 [76]
  • Australopithecus africanus 452 cm3 [77]
  • Paranthropus boisei 521 cmthree
  • Paranthropus robustus 530 cm3

See also [edit]

  • Brain-to-body mass ratio
  • Encephalization quotient
  • List of animals by number of neurons
  • Craniometry — includes historical discussion
  • Neuroscience and intelligence
  • Human brain

References [edit]

  1. ^ Parent, A; Carpenter MB (1995). "Ch. 1". Carpenter's Human Neuroanatomy. Williams & Wilkins. ISBN978-0-683-06752-1.
  2. ^ Harrison, Paul J.; Freemantle, Nick; Geddes, John R. (November 2003). "Meta-assay of brain weight in schizophrenia". Schizophrenia Research. 64 (1): 25–34. doi:ten.1016/s0920-9964(02)00502-ix. PMID 14511798. S2CID 3102745.
  3. ^ a b c d e Cosgrove, Kelly P.; Mazure, Carolyn M.; Staley, Julie K. (Oct 2007). "Evolving Cognition of Sex Differences in Encephalon Structure, Function, and Chemistry". Biological Psychiatry. 62 (8): 847–855. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.03.001. PMC2711771. PMID 17544382.
  4. ^ "Neanderthal man". infoplease.
  5. ^ McAuliffe, Kathleen (2011-01-20). "If Modern Humans Are And then Smart, Why Are Our Brains Shrinking?". DiscoverMagazine.com . Retrieved 2014-03-05 .
  6. ^ a b c DeSilva, Jeremy M.; Traniello, James F. A.; Claxton, Alexander G.; Fannin, Luke D. (2021). "When and Why Did Man Brains Subtract in Size? A New Change-Point Analysis and Insights From Brain Evolution in Ants". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. nine: 712. doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.742639. ISSN 2296-701X.
  7. ^ Henneberg, Maciej (1988). "Subtract of human skull size in the Holocene". Human Biology. lx (three): 395–405. JSTOR 41464021. PMID 3134287.
  8. ^ Rushton, J.Philippe (July 1992). "Cranial capacity related to sex, rank, and race in a stratified random sample of half-dozen,325 U.S. armed services personnel". Intelligence. xvi (three–4): 401–413. doi:x.1016/0160-2896(92)90017-l.
  9. ^ Brown, Graham; Fairfax, Stephanie; Sarao, Nidhi. "Man Evolution". Tree of Life. Tree of Life Project. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
  10. ^ a b Falk, Dean; Hildebolt, Charles; Smith, Kirk; Morwood, M. J.; Sutikna, Thomas; Brown, Peter; Jatmiko; Saptomo, E. Wayhu; Brunsden, Barry; Prior, Fred (8 Apr 2005). "The Brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis". Scientific discipline. 308 (5719): 242–245. doi:10.1126/scientific discipline.1109727. PMID 15749690. S2CID 43166136.
  11. ^ Sutikna, Thomas; Tocheri, Matthew W.; et al. (30 March 2016). "Revised stratigraphy and chronology for Homo floresiensis at Liang Bua in Republic of indonesia". Nature. 532 (7599): 366–9. Bibcode:2016Natur.532..366S. doi:10.1038/nature17179. PMID 27027286. S2CID 4469009.
  12. ^ F. Spoor; P. Gunz; Southward. Neubauer; S. Stelzer; N. Scott; A. Kwekason; G. C. Dean (2015). "Reconstructed Homo habilis type OH seven suggests deep-rooted species multifariousness in early on Homo". Nature. 519 (7541): 83–86. Bibcode:2015Natur.519...83S. doi:10.1038/nature14224. PMID 25739632. S2CID 4470282.
  13. ^ Baeckens, Simon; Van Damme, Raoul (20 April 2020). "The island syndrome". Current Biology. 30 (8): R329–R339. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.029. PMID 32315628.
  14. ^ Herculano-Houzel, Suzana (1 March 2011). "Scaling of Encephalon Metabolism with a Fixed Energy Upkeep per Neuron: Implications for Neuronal Action, Plasticity and Development". PLOS ONE. half dozen (3): e17514. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017514. PMC3046985. PMID 21390261.
  15. ^ Kouprina, Natalay; Pavlicek, Adam; Mochida, Ganeshwaran H; Solomon, Gregory; Gersch, William; Yoon, Young-Ho; Collura, Randall; Ruvolo, Maryellen; Barrett, J. Carl; Woods, C. Geoffrey; Walsh, Christopher A; Jurka, Jerzy; Larionov, Vladimir (23 March 2004). "Accelerated Evolution of the ASPM Gene Decision-making Brain Size Begins Prior to Human Brain Expansion". PLOS Biology. 2 (v): e126. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020126. PMC374243. PMID 15045028.
  16. ^ "When and why did human brains decrease in size 3,000 years ago? Ants may hold clues". phys.org . Retrieved 15 Nov 2021.
  17. ^ Bracci, Aria. "A rat had basically no encephalon—simply information technology could still see, hear, scent and feel". Northeastern University . Retrieved 22 November 2021.
  18. ^ Ferris, C. F.; Cai, X.; Qiao, J.; Switzer, B.; Baun, J.; Morrison, T.; Iriah, Southward.; Madularu, D.; Sinkevicius, G. W.; Kulkarni, P. (11 November 2019). "Life without a brain: Neuroradiological and behavioral evidence of neuroplasticity necessary to sustain brain function in the face of severe hydrocephalus". Scientific Reports. ix (1): 16479. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53042-3. ISSN 2045-2322.
  19. ^ Forsdyke, Donald R. (i Dec 2015). "Wittgenstein'due south Certainty is Uncertain: Encephalon Scans of Cured Hydrocephalics Challenge Cherished Assumptions". Biological Theory. 10 (4): 336–342. doi:10.1007/s13752-015-0219-x. ISSN 1555-5550.
  20. ^ "Remarkable story of maths genius who had nigh no encephalon". The Irish Times . Retrieved 22 November 2021.
  21. ^ "Lost Research Notes Articulate upwardly Racial Bias Fence in Old Skull Size Study".
  22. ^ "The disturbing return of scientific racism". Wired UK.
  23. ^ a b Mitchell, Paul Wolff (iv Oct 2018). "The error in his seeds: Lost notes to the case of bias in Samuel George Morton'south cranial race science". PLOS Biology. sixteen (x): e2007008. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2007008. PMC6171794. PMID 30286069. S2CID 52919024.
  24. ^ a b Gould, S. J. (1981). The Mismeasure of Human. New York: West. W. Norton & Visitor.[ page needed ]
  25. ^ Graves, Joseph L. (September 2015). "Nifty Is Their Sin: Biological Determinism in the Age of Genomics". The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 661 (one): 24–l. doi:10.1177/0002716215586558. S2CID 146963288.
  26. ^ Kaplan, Jonathan Michael; Pigliucci, Massimo; Banta, Joshua Alexander (1 August 2015). "Gould on Morton, Redux: What can the fence reveal about the limits of information?". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Function C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 52: 22–31. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.001. PMID 25666493.
  27. ^ Kamin, Leon J.; Omari, Safiya (September 1998). "Race, Caput Size, and Intelligence". South African Journal of Psychology. 28 (iii): 119–128. doi:ten.1177/008124639802800301. S2CID 53117248.
  28. ^ Beals, Kenneth 50.; Smith, Courtland 50.; Dodd, Stephen Chiliad.; Angel, J. Lawrence; Armstrong, Este; Blumenberg, Bennett; Girgis, Fakhry One thousand.; Turkel, Spencer; Gibson, Kathleen R.; Henneberg, Maciej; Menk, Roland; Morimoto, Iwataro; Sokal, Robert R.; Trinkaus, Erik (June 1984). "Brain Size, Cranial Morphology, Climate, and Fourth dimension Machines [and Comments and Reply]" (PDF). Electric current Anthropology. 25 (3): 312. doi:10.1086/203138. S2CID 86147507.
  29. ^ Giedd, Jay N.; Blumenthal, Jonathan; Jeffries, Neal O.; Castellanos, F. X.; Liu, Hong; Zijdenbos, Alex; Paus, Tomáš; Evans, Alan C.; Rapoport, Judith 50. (October 1999). "Brain development during babyhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI written report". Nature Neuroscience. ii (10): 861–863. doi:10.1038/13158. PMID 10491603. S2CID 204989935.
  30. ^ Peters, R. (2006). "Ageing and the brain". Postgraduate Medical Periodical. 82 (964): 84–8. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.036665. PMC2596698. PMID 16461469.
  31. ^ Kelley Hays; David S. (1998). Reader in Gender archaeology. Routlegde. ISBN9780415173605 . Retrieved 2014-09-21 .
  32. ^ Carne, Ross P.; Vogrin, Simon; Litewka, Lucas; Melt, Mark J. (January 2006). "Cerebral cortex: An MRI-based written report of volume and variance with age and sexual activity". Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 13 (1): 60–72. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2005.02.013. PMID 16410199. S2CID 20486422.
  33. ^ Taki, Y.; Thyreau, B.; Kinomura, S.; Sato, K.; Goto, R.; Kawashima, R.; Fukuda, H. (2011). He, Yong (ed.). "Correlations among Brain Grey Affair Volumes, Age, Gender, and Hemisphere in Salubrious Individuals". PLOS ONE. 6 (7): e22734. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...622734T. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022734. PMC3144937. PMID 21818377.
  34. ^ Giedd, Jay North. (April 2008). "The Teen Brain: Insights from Neuroimaging". Periodical of Adolescent Health. 42 (four): 335–343. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.01.007. PMID 18346658.
  35. ^ Rabinowicz, Theodore; Petetot, Jean MacDonald-Comber; Gartside, Peter Due south.; Sheyn, David; Sheyn, Tony; de Courten-Myers, Gabrielle M. (January 2002). "Construction of the Cognitive Cortex in Men and Women". Periodical of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology. 61 (1): 46–57. doi:ten.1093/jnen/61.1.46. PMID 11829343. S2CID 16815298. ProQuest 229729071.
  36. ^ Alonso-Nanclares, 50.; Gonzalez-Soriano, J.; Rodriguez, J. R.; DeFelipe, J. (23 September 2008). "Gender differences in man cortical synaptic density". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.s.a.. 105 (38): 14615–14619. Bibcode:2008PNAS..10514615A. doi:ten.1073/pnas.0803652105. JSTOR 25464278. PMC2567215. PMID 18779570.
  37. ^ Pakkenberg, Bente; Gundersen, Hans Jørgen G. (1997). "Neocortical neuron number in humans: Effect of sexual practice and historic period". Periodical of Comparative Neurology. 384 (2): 312–320. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970728)384:2<312::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO;2-K. PMID 9215725.
  38. ^ Expert, Catriona D.; Johnsrude, Ingrid S.; Ashburner, John; Henson, Richard N.A.; Friston, Karl J.; Frackowiak, Richard South.J. (July 2001). "A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study of Ageing in 465 Normal Adult Human Brains" (PDF). NeuroImage. xiv (1): 21–36. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0786. PMID 11525331. S2CID 6392260. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-11-17.
  39. ^ Peper, Jiska Due south.; Brouwer, Rachel M.; Boomsma, Dorret I.; Kahn, René South.; Hulshoff Pol, Hilleke E. (June 2007). "Genetic influences on homo brain structure: A review of brain imaging studies in twins". Human Encephalon Mapping. 28 (six): 464–473. doi:10.1002/hbm.20398. PMC6871295. PMID 17415783.
  40. ^ Zhang, Jianzhi (December 2003). "Evolution of the human ASPM gene, a major determinant of brain size". Genetics. 165 (4): 2063–2070. doi:10.1093/genetics/165.4.2063. PMC1462882. PMID 14704186.
  41. ^ a b c Nisbett, Richard Eastward.; Aronson, Joshua; Blair, Clancy; Dickens, William; Flynn, James; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkheimer, Eric (February 2012). "Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments" (PDF). American Psychologist. 67 (ii): 130–159. doi:x.1037/a0026699. PMID 22233090. S2CID 7001642. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-12-30.
  42. ^ Mcdaniel, K (July 2005). "Big-brained people are smarter: A meta-analysis of the relationship between in vivo brain book and intelligence". Intelligence. 33 (4): 337–346. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2004.11.005.
  43. ^ a b Luders, Eileen; Narr, Katherine L.; Thompson, Paul M.; Toga, Arthur Westward. (March 2009). "Neuroanatomical correlates of intelligence". Intelligence. 37 (2): 156–163. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.07.002. PMC2770698. PMID 20160919.
  44. ^ Hoppe, Christian; Stojanovic, Jelena (August 2008). "High-Aptitude Minds". Scientific American Mind. xix (four): 60–67. doi:ten.1038/scientificamericanmind0808-sixty.
  45. ^ Allen, John S.; Damasio, Hanna; Grabowski, Thomas J. (August 2002). "Normal neuroanatomical variation in the human brain: An MRI-volumetric study". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 118 (4): 341–358. doi:10.1002/ajpa.10092. PMID 12124914.
  46. ^ Egan, Vincent; Chiswick, Ann; Santosh, Celestine; Naidu, Thou.; Rimmington, J.Ewen; All-time, Jonathan J.Chiliad. (September 1994). "Size isn't everything: A study of brain volume, intelligence and auditory evoked potentials". Personality and Individual Differences. 17 (3): 357–367. doi:x.1016/0191-8869(94)90283-6.
  47. ^ Egan, Vincent; Wickett, John C.; Vernon, Philip A. (July 1995). "Brain size and intelligence: erratum, addendum, and correction". Personality and Individual Differences. 19 (1): 113–115. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)00043-6.
  48. ^ Lee, H.; Devlin, J. T.; Shakeshaft, C.; Stewart, 50. H.; Brennan, A.; Glensman, J.; Pitcher, K.; Crinion, J.; Mechelli, A.; Frackowiak, R. South. J.; Green, D. W.; Price, C. J. (31 Jan 2007). "Anatomical Traces of Vocabulary Acquisition in the Boyish Brain". Journal of Neuroscience. 27 (5): 1184–1189. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4442-06.2007. PMC6673201. PMID 17267574. S2CID 10268073.
  49. ^ Driemeyer, Joenna; Boyke, Janina; Gaser, Christian; Büchel, Christian; May, Arne (23 July 2008). "Changes in Gray Affair Induced by Learning—Revisited". PLOS ONE. iii (7): e2669. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...three.2669D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002669. PMC2447176. PMID 18648501. S2CID 13906832.
  50. ^ Ilg, R.; Wohlschlager, A. M.; Gaser, C.; Liebau, Y.; Dauner, R.; Woller, A.; Zimmer, C.; Zihl, J.; Muhlau, Grand. (xvi April 2008). "Grayness Thing Increase Induced by Do Correlates with Task-Specific Activation: A Combined Functional and Morphometric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study". Journal of Neuroscience. 28 (16): 4210–4215. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5722-07.2008. PMC6670304. PMID 18417700. S2CID 8454258.
  51. ^ Kevin Kelly. "The Technium: Brains of White Matter". kk.org.
  52. ^ Armstrong, Eastward (17 June 1983). "Relative brain size and metabolism in mammals". Scientific discipline. 220 (4603): 1302–1304. Bibcode:1983Sci...220.1302A. doi:10.1126/science.6407108. PMID 6407108.
  53. ^ Savage, 5. Grand.; Gillooly, J. F.; Woodruff, Due west. H.; West, G. B.; Allen, A. P.; Enquist, B. J.; Chocolate-brown, J. H. (April 2004). "The predominance of quarter-power scaling in biology". Functional Ecology. 18 (two): 257–282. doi:10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00856.x.
  54. ^ Jerison, Harry J. (1973). Evolution of the Encephalon and Intelligence. Academic Printing. ISBN978-0-12-385250-2. [ folio needed ]
  55. ^ Roth G, Dicke U (May 2005). "Evolution of the brain and intelligence". Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.). 9 (v): 250–7. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.005. PMID 15866152. S2CID 14758763.
  56. ^ Finlay, Barbara L.; Darlington, Richard B.; Nicastro, Nicholas (April 2001). "Developmental structure in brain evolution" (PDF). Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 24 (2): 263–278. doi:x.1017/S0140525X01003958. PMID 11530543. S2CID 20978251. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-02-25.
  57. ^ Kappelman, John (March 1996). "The evolution of body mass and relative brain size in fossil hominids". Journal of Human Development. 30 (3): 243–276. doi:x.1006/jhev.1996.0021.
  58. ^ Holloway, Ralph L. (1996). "Toward a synthetic theory of man brain development". Origins of the Man Brain. pp. 42–54. doi:ten.1093/acprof:oso/9780198523901.003.0003. ISBN978-0-19-852390-i.
  59. ^ Roth, G; Dicke, U (May 2005). "Evolution of the brain and intelligence". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 9 (v): 250–257. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.005. PMID 15866152. S2CID 14758763.
  60. ^ Motluk, Alison (28 July 2010). "Size isn't everything: The big brain myth". New Scientist.
  61. ^ Azevedo, Frederico A.C.; Carvalho, Ludmila R.B.; Grinberg, Lea T.; Farfel, José Marcelo; Ferretti, Renata E.50.; Leite, Renata E.P.; Filho, Wilson Jacob; Lent, Roberto; Herculano-Houzel, Suzana (ten April 2009). "Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells brand the human brain an isometrically scaled-upward primate brain". The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 513 (5): 532–541. doi:10.1002/cne.21974. PMID 19226510. S2CID 5200449. We find that the adult male person human brain contains on average 86.i ± viii.1 billion NeuN-positive cells ("neurons") and 84.6 ± 9.8 billion NeuN-negative ("nonneuronal") cells. [...] These findings claiming the common view that humans stand out from other primates in their encephalon limerick and indicate that, with regard to numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells, the human brain is an isometrically scaled-up primate encephalon.
  62. ^ Ross, Callum; Henneberg, Maciej (December 1995). "Basicranial flexion, relative encephalon size, and facial kyphosis inHomo sapiens and some fossil hominids". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 98 (4): 575–593. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330980413. PMID 8599387.
  63. ^ Logan, Corina J.; Clutton-Brock, Tim H. (Jan 2013). "Validating methods for estimating endocranial volume in individual red deer (Cervus elaphus)". Behavioural Processes. 92: 143–146. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2012.10.015. PMID 23137587. S2CID 32069068.
  64. ^ Logan, Corina J.; Palmstrom, Christin R. (eleven June 2015). "Can endocranial volume exist estimated accurately from external skull measurements in great-tailed grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus)?". PeerJ. 3: e1000. doi:10.7717/peerj.1000. PMC4465945. PMID 26082858.
  65. ^ Rushton, J. Philippe; Jensen, Arthur R. (2005). "Thirty years of enquiry on race differences in cerebral power". Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. xi (2): 235–294. CiteSeerXx.1.1.186.102. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235.
  66. ^ "BBC News - Dark winters 'led to bigger human brains and eyeballs'". BBC News. 27 July 2011.
  67. ^ Alok Jha (27 July 2011). "People at darker, higher latitudes evolved bigger eyes and brains". the Guardian.
  68. ^ Stanford, C., Allen, J.S., Anton, S.C., Lovell, N.C. (2009). Biological Anthropology: the Natural History of Humankind. Toronto: Pearson Canada. p. 301
  69. ^ a b Pearce, Eiluned; Stringer, Chris; Dunbar, R. I. K. (vii May 2013). "New insights into differences in encephalon system between Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans". Proceedings of the Purple Society B: Biological Sciences. 280 (1758): 20130168. doi:x.1098/rspb.2013.0168. PMC3619466. PMID 23486442.
  70. ^ Cohen, Jon (20 June 2018). "Exclusive: Neanderthal 'minibrains' grown in dish". Science.
  71. ^ a b Michael Marshall (February 5, 2022). "160,000-year-sometime fossil may be the outset Denisovan skull nosotros've found". New Scientist.
  72. ^ a b Xiu-Jie Wu; et al. (Feb 2022). "Evolution of cranial capacity revisited: A view from the late Middle Pleistocene attic from Xujiayao, China". Journal of Human Evolution. doi:ten.1016/j.jhevol.2021.103119.
  73. ^ Campbell, Grand.C., Loy, J.D., Cruz-Uribe, G. (2006). Humankind Emerging: Ninth Edition. Boston: Pearson. p346
  74. ^ Holloway, Ralph L., Yuan, One thousand. Due south., and Broadfield, D.C. (2004). The Human Fossil Tape: Encephalon Endocasts: The Paleoneurological Show. New York. John Wiley & Sons Publishers (http://www.columbia.edu/~rlh2/PartII.pdf and http://world wide web.columbia.edu/~rlh2/available_pdfs.html for further references).
  75. ^ Haile-Selassie, Yohannes; Melillo, Stephanie M.; Vazzana, Antonino; Benazzi, Stefano; Ryan, Timothy M. (12 September 2019). "A 3.8-million-year-old hominin cranium from Woranso-Mille, Ethiopia". Nature. 573 (7773): 214–219. Bibcode:2019Natur.573..214H. doi:x.1038/s41586-019-1513-eight. hdl:11585/697577. PMID 31462770. S2CID 201656331.
  76. ^ Lieberman, Daniel. THE EVOLUTION OF THE Human being HEAD. p. 433.
  77. ^ Lieberman, Daniel. THE Development OF THE HUMAN Caput. p. 435.

Further reading [edit]

  • Jabr, Ferris (28 November 2015). "How Humans Ended Upwardly With Freakishly Huge Brains". Wired . Retrieved 29 November 2015.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_size

Posted by: suzukiwhourpel2001.blogspot.com

0 Response to "What Animal Has The Same Size Brain As A Human"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel